Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves. / Newell, David W.; Nedergaard, Maiken; Aaslid, Rune.
In: Frontiers in Neurology, Vol. 13, 872701, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological Mechanisms and Significance of Intracranial B Waves
AU - Newell, David W.
AU - Nedergaard, Maiken
AU - Aaslid, Rune
N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Newell, Nedergaard and Aaslid.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: Recently published studies have described slow spontaneous cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oscillations measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential drivers of brain glymphatic flow, with a similar frequency as intracranial B-waves. Aiming to establish the relationship between these waveforms, we performed additional analysis of frequency and waveform parameters, of our previously published transcranial Doppler (TCD) and intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings of intracranial B waves, to compare to published MRI frequency measurements of CBF and CSF slow oscillations. Patients and Methods: We analyzed digital recordings of B waves in 29 patients with head injury, including middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow velocity (FV), ICP, end tidal CO2, and arterial blood pressure (ABP). A subset of these recordings demonstrated high B wave activity and was further analyzed for parameters including frequency, interaction, and waveform distribution curve features. These measures were compared to published similar measurements of spontaneous CBF and CSF fluctuations evaluated using MRI. Results: In patients with at least 10% amplitude B wave activity, the MCA blood flow velocity oscillations comprising the B waves, had a maximum amplitude at 0.0245 Hz, and time derivative a maximum amplitude at 0.035 Hz. The frequency range of the B waves was between 0.6–2.3 cycles per min (0.011-0.038 Hz), which is in the same range as MRI measured CBF slow oscillations, reported in human volunteers. Waveform asymmetry in MCA velocity and ICP cycles during B waves, was also similar to published MRI measured CBF slow oscillations. Cross-correlation analysis showed equivalent time derivatives of FV vs. ICP in B waves, compared to MRI measured CBF slow oscillations vs. CSF flow fluctuations. Conclusions: The TCD and ICP recordings of intracranial B waves show a similar frequency range as CBF and CSF flow oscillations measured using MRI, and share other unique morphological wave features. These findings strongly suggest a common physiological mechanism underlying the two classes of phenomena. The slow blood flow and volume oscillations causing intracranial B waves appear to be part of a cascade that may provide a significant driving force for compartmentalized CSF movement and facilitate glymphatic flow.
AB - Objective: Recently published studies have described slow spontaneous cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) oscillations measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential drivers of brain glymphatic flow, with a similar frequency as intracranial B-waves. Aiming to establish the relationship between these waveforms, we performed additional analysis of frequency and waveform parameters, of our previously published transcranial Doppler (TCD) and intracranial pressure (ICP) recordings of intracranial B waves, to compare to published MRI frequency measurements of CBF and CSF slow oscillations. Patients and Methods: We analyzed digital recordings of B waves in 29 patients with head injury, including middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow velocity (FV), ICP, end tidal CO2, and arterial blood pressure (ABP). A subset of these recordings demonstrated high B wave activity and was further analyzed for parameters including frequency, interaction, and waveform distribution curve features. These measures were compared to published similar measurements of spontaneous CBF and CSF fluctuations evaluated using MRI. Results: In patients with at least 10% amplitude B wave activity, the MCA blood flow velocity oscillations comprising the B waves, had a maximum amplitude at 0.0245 Hz, and time derivative a maximum amplitude at 0.035 Hz. The frequency range of the B waves was between 0.6–2.3 cycles per min (0.011-0.038 Hz), which is in the same range as MRI measured CBF slow oscillations, reported in human volunteers. Waveform asymmetry in MCA velocity and ICP cycles during B waves, was also similar to published MRI measured CBF slow oscillations. Cross-correlation analysis showed equivalent time derivatives of FV vs. ICP in B waves, compared to MRI measured CBF slow oscillations vs. CSF flow fluctuations. Conclusions: The TCD and ICP recordings of intracranial B waves show a similar frequency range as CBF and CSF flow oscillations measured using MRI, and share other unique morphological wave features. These findings strongly suggest a common physiological mechanism underlying the two classes of phenomena. The slow blood flow and volume oscillations causing intracranial B waves appear to be part of a cascade that may provide a significant driving force for compartmentalized CSF movement and facilitate glymphatic flow.
KW - B waves
KW - cerebral blood flow
KW - cerebrospinal fluid circulation
KW - delta wave EEG
KW - glymphatic pathway
KW - intracranial pressure
KW - non-REM sleep
KW - transcranial Doppler
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2022.872701
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2022.872701
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35651339
AN - SCOPUS:85131354127
VL - 13
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
SN - 1664-2295
M1 - 872701
ER -
ID: 343291440